A New Look at the Neonate's Clinical Presentation After In Utero Exposure to Antidepressants in Late Pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify symptoms in neonates exposed to antidepressants in late pregnancy and to propose a categorization of these symptoms to help clinical assessment of antidepressant effects in exposed neonates. METHODS: Data were extracted retrospectively from maternal and neonatal hospital charts. A total of 73 neonates exposed to antidepressant and 73 nonexposed neonates were included. Neonatal symptoms reported in the literature to be related to antidepressant exposure were collected. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association of neonatal symptoms and antidepressant exposure. Factorial analysis was used to regroup the neonatal symptoms. RESULTS: Increased risk of alertness alteration (odds ratio [OR], 37;95% confidence interval [CI], 8-174), altered muscular tone (OR,20; 95% CI, 5-71), feeding and GI problems (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.1), tachypnea (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-5.3), and neurological problems (8/73 vs 0/73; P = 0.006) were found. Three statistically significant clusters of symptoms associated with antidepressant exposures emerged from the factorial analysis. Two of these clusters were similar to those described in adults for serotonergic toxicity and antidepressant discontinuation syndrome while the other was closely related to neonatal immaturity. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms expressed in neonates exposed to antidepressants in late pregnancy could be gathered in three clusters. This grouping could be useful to develop a new tool helping in the assessment and care of the exposed newborns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".