MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Bioknotless Suture Anchor For The Treatment Of Shoulder Instability: Clinical Results

2009· article· en· W2028424366 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeremy Statton, Troy Diehl, Paul Favorito

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical examinationRadiographyExternal rotationSurgeryInternal rotation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic shoulder instability has become a well accepted procedure. Knotless suture anchors are one type of implant utilized for capsulolabral repair and have several advantages compared to other available devices. The use of these anchors, however, has been associated with unfavorable outcomes. The purpose of this study is to report our results of arthroscopically treated shoulder instability with a knotless, bioabsorbable suture anchor. METHODS: We identified and contacted patients who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair of the shoulder with the BioKnotless anchor (DePuy Mitek, Raynam, Massachusetts). All patients had a minimum follow up of 2 years. Patient evaluation included a subjective questionnaire, physical exam, radiographs, and an MRI if indicated. All patients completed validated shoulder and health measurement outcome tools including the Simple Shoulder Test, the Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12), and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). RESULTS: Eight patients were evaluated. The mean age was 28.9 years. There were 6 males and 2 females. The mean time to follow up was 33.6 months. No patients had any episodes of recurrent instability. When compared to the contralateral shoulder, patients lost an average of 2.5° of forward flexion, 6.3° of external rotation, and 11.3° of internal rotation. No patients had instability on physical exam as determined by apprehension, relocation or load and shift testing. Radiographic examination revealed no evidence of osteolysis, chondrolysis or degenerative changes. The mean WOSI score was 65.2% (out of 100%). The mean Simple Shoulder Test score was 10.4 (out of 12). The mean physical component to the SF-12 was 51.0 (population mean 52.5) and the mental component was 55.5 (population mean 53.1). CONCLUSIONS: Patients did report some level of disability of the shoulder determined by the WOSI, Simple Shoulder Test, and SF-12 scores. There was no radiographic evidence of osteolysis or glenohumeral arthritis. None of the patients reported any recurrence of instability. When properly utilized, the Bioknotless anchor remains a viable and safe option for successful treating symptomatic shoulder instability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicShoulder Injury and Treatment→French-language works237,207→