Distribution of intramuscular fat content and marbling within the longissimus muscle of pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A better knowledge of intramuscular fat (IMF) content distribution would allow the identification of a predictive site on the longissimus muscle to assess the total IMF content. For this purpose, 50 commercial crossbred pigs of both genders were selected live with ultrasound equipment at the 3rd/4th last rib in order to provide backfat differences varying from 10 to 34.7 mm. Left longissimus muscles were deboned and sliced every 2 cm from the posterior (3rd last lumbar vertebra) to the anterior (5th thoracic rib) end. In all, 14 locations on the longissimus muscle were established and labeled as T5-T14 (thoracic region) and L1-L4 (lumbar region). The slices were used for subjective marbling evaluation and for intramuscular fat content (IMF) measurement. The results showed that total IMF content and marbling scores were correlated (r = 0.86) and followed a similar pattern, with highest values being obtained in the middle section of the thoracic region and in the middle-caudal section of the lumbar area. In addition, both IMF content and marbling scores were anatomical location dependant. Gender did not affect IMF content, but influenced marbling score, castrates being more marbled (score: 2.77 vs. 2.35) than females. The IMF content (R 2 : 0.94–0.95) and marbling score (R 2 : 0.7–-0.81) were the best predictors of mean IMF when measured at or near the grading site (3rd/4th last rib). Key words: Pork, intramuscular fat, marbling score, longissimus muscle, within muscle variation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".