CFRP-Strengthened and Corroded RC Beams under Monotonic and Fatigue Loads
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental program has been carried out to investigate the structural behavior of RC beams strengthened by carbon-fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets and exposed to a corrosive environment. A total of eight specimens (120 × 175 × 2,000 mm) were tested. Six specimens were CFRP strengthened and corroded, one specimen was unstrengthened and corroded, and one specimen was neither strengthened nor corroded. Two different strengthening schemes were applied: (1) wrapping the specimen with CFRP sheets; and (2) both specimen wrapping and flexural strengthening. Three specimens were tested under monotonic loading and five specimens were tested in fatigue. The results showed that the use of CFRP sheets for strengthening RC beams that are experiencing steel reinforcement corrosion is an efficient technique that can maintain the structural integrity and enhance the structural behavior of such beams. The ultimate monotonic strength of the CFRP strengthened-corroded specimens increased to a level between 37 and 87% above the predicted strength of a similar unstrengthened-uncorroded (virgin) specimen. The fatigue life of the CFRP strengthened-corroded specimens was increased within a range of 2.5–6.0 times that of a similar unstrengthened-corroded specimen but was lower than that of the uncorroded (virgin) specimen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it