MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028494431 · doi:10.1021/ic900240y

Copper Coordination Polymers Based on Single-Chain or Sheet Structures Involving Dinuclear and Tetranuclear Copper(II) Units: Synthesis, Structures, and Magnetostructural Correlations

2009· article· en· W2028494431 on OpenAlex
Santokh S. Tandon, S.D. Bunge, D.H. Motry, José Sánchez Costa, Guillem Aromı́, J. Reedijk, Laurence K. Thompson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCrystallographyLigand (biochemistry)CopperAntiferromagnetismAzideSupramolecular chemistrySchiff baseStereochemistryAlkoxideCrystal structureCatalysisReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reactions between the potentially pentadentate (N(2)O(3)), trianionic double Schiff-base ligand 2,6-bis[[(2-hydroxyethyl)imino]methyl]-4-methylphenol (H(3)L) and Cu(CH(3)CO(2))(2) or Cu(ClO(4))(2), in the presence of NaN(3), give novel coordination polymers with chain {[Cu(2)(H(2)L)(N(3))(3)](2).H(2)O}(n) (1) or sheet [Cu(2)(H(2)L)(N(3))(3)](n) (2) and [Cu(2)(HL)(N(3))](n)[ClO(4)](n) (3) structures, respectively. These clusters are comprised of repeating dinuclear units (1) or their dimers (2 and 3). In these compounds, H(3)L acts as a tridentate (N(2)O) monoanionic (1), tetradentate (ON(2)O) monoanionic (2), or pentadentate (O(3)N(2)) dianionic (3) ligand. Compound [Cu(2)(HL)(N(3))(2)(H(2)O)].0.5CH(3)OH (4) formed from the reaction of Cu(CH(3)CO(2))(2) with H(3)L under reflux, which did not afford crystals suitable for X-ray studies. X-ray structure determinations have revealed that the basic building block in 1-3 comprises two copper centers bridged through one mu-phenolate O atom from H(2)L(-) or HL(2-) and one mu-azido(N1,N1) ion. Compounds 1-3 unveil three different ways in which this Cu(2) basic unit may be organized in the crystalline phase at the supramolecular level through a variety of bridging interactions involving additional azide ligands or alkoxide groups from the side arms of the ligand H(3)L. Bulk magnetization measurements have served to demonstrate that the magnetic interactions are completely dominated by the strong antiferromagnetic coupling occurring within the Cu(2) building block, with coupling constants ranging from 330 to 560 cm(-1) (in the H = -JS(1)S(2) convention). These results together have been incorporated with data from the few related copper dimers reported exhibiting the same bridging pattern into a study aimed at extracting possible magnetostructural correlations within this Cu(2) unit. An earlier predicted correlation between J and the angle formed by the phenoxide bridge and the Cu(2) core has been identified for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it