MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028615441 · doi:10.1097/wnf.0000000000000020

Generalized Myoclonus and Spasticity Induced by Lamotrigine Toxicity

2014· review· en· W2028615441 on OpenAlexaff
Hussein Algahtani, Ahmed Aldarmahi, Mohammed W. Al-Rabia, Waleed Hassan Almalki, G. Bryan Young

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Neuropharmacology · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyoclonusLamotrigineStatus epilepticusMedicineAnesthesiaAnticonvulsantMyoclonic JerkEpilepsyConvulsionToxicityInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lamotrigine (LTG) is a well-tolerated broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug, which is chemically unrelated to other existing antiepileptic medications. The drug has also some mood-stabilizing properties and, according to some studies, modest antidepressant effects. The exact mechanism of action is unknown, but some animal studies suggest the inhibition of neuronal glutamate release. Despite being relatively safe, LTG has been demonstrated to have proconvulsant effect especially in certain types of epilepsies like myoclonic status epilepticus. Myoclonic status epilepticus and its variations including generalized myoclonic status epilepticus, status myoclonus, and prolonged myoclonus describe a variety of clinical states, which have continuous, unremitting seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes. It is not a commonly reported treatment-emergent neurological complication, but the treatment is always a medical emergency. We report a case of a 46-year-old man who developed generalized myoclonus status epilepticus a few hours after suicidal ingestion of LTG. He remained hemodynamically stable throughout hospitalization and started to recover and achieved complete recovery 3 days later. This is the first reported case of this de novo complication induced by LTG toxicity. We proposed a subcortical mechanism for this complication induced by the toxic doses of LTG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical NeuropharmacologySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207