MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028615829 · doi:10.2118/97358-ms

Next Generation Parallel Computing for Large-Scale Reservoir Simulation

2005· article· en· W2028615829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE International Improved Oil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReservoir simulationScalabilityComputer scienceMassively parallelGridReservoir engineeringField (mathematics)Reservoir modelingDistributed computingScale (ratio)SupercomputerSoftwareComputational scienceParallel computingPetroleum engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper describes application of Project INTERSECT, a next generation highly scalable reservoir simulator on real large scale field models. High resolution reservoir simulation is required to better define and describe fluid flow and enable improved field development and tactical operational planning. Massively parallel computing techniques overcome limitations of problem size and space resolution. This paper demonstrates that large-scale simulation models can be performed on commodity hardware taking advantage of evolution in multicpu hardware architecture and software engineering. This allows both geologists and reservoir engineers to include more realistic geologic and engineering detail for better and more reliable production optimization. Intense computer simulation is essential for effective reservoir management. The advances in reservoir characterization techniques and the industry drive towards the ‘smart oilfield’ with rapid model updates will require more efficient model processing to achieve timely field operational decisions. Parallel reservoir simulators have the potential to solve larger, more realistic problems than previously possible. The size and application of reservoir simulation problems have been limited by the availability of computing hardware, reservoir simulation architecture and of solution methods for solving large-scale heterogeneous problems. The next generation reservoir simulator demonstrates that key modeling challenges has been overcome by a software architecture and capability to model more realistic subsurface and surface models. Applications of the new reservoir simulator illustrates how typical reservoir engineering options such as local grid refinement, local grid coarsening, multilateral wells and aquifer modeling affect the overall parallel performance and scalability using highly heterogeneous large-scale models. Application of new modeling techniques highlight increased accuracy of modeling results and more reliable field development planning and reservoir management decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it