MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Three Decades of Corneal Transplantation: Indications and Patient Characteristics

2000· article· en· W2028634883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCornea · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKeratoconusMedicineEtiologyCorneal transplantationDermatologyBullous keratopathyRetrospective cohort studyOphthalmologyDystrophyCorneal dystrophyTransplantationSurgeryCorneaInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To review the indications and patient characteristics for penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). METHODS: Retrospective review of records at the Pathology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Toronto from 1964 to 1997. RESULTS: The 6,222 records were reviewed. The leading indications for PKP were regraft, keratoconus (KC), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK), Fuchs' dystrophy, viral infections, and trauma, in that order. During the second half of the 1980s, PBK replaced KC as the leading indication for transplantation. The average age of patients increased from 49 (+/-19) years during the second half of the 1960s to 63 (+/-20) years at the first half of the 1990s. Gender differences (M/F ratio) were significant for KC, viral keratopathy, trauma, PBK, aphakic bullous keratopathy (ABK), edema of unspecified etiology, interstitial keratitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and Fuchs' dystrophy. Diagnostic category differences between all patients for PKPs and regrafts were significant for autoimmune keratolysis, congenital opacities, PBK, ABK, edema of unspecified etiology, scarring, Fuchs' dystrophy, and KC. CONCLUSION: Indications are in accordance with the literature with the exception of regraft, which was higher. An increase in the average age of patients corresponded with the PBK epidemic. The high male-to-female ratio among patients with KC was different from that previously reported for the prevalence of this condition. Sex distribution among patients with PBK and ABK showed a female predominance. Differences in the underlying disease distributions between regrafted patients and the rest of the series coincide with prognostic classifications for PKP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it