MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prior exercise speeds pulmonary O<sub>2</sub> uptake kinetics by increases in both local muscle O<sub>2</sub> availability and O<sub>2</sub> utilization

2007· article· en· W2028641769 on OpenAlexaff
Darren S. DeLorey, John M. Kowalchuk, Aaron P. Heenan, Gregory R. duManoir, Donald H. Paterson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeoxygenationIntensity (physics)MyoglobinDeoxygenated HemoglobinVastus lateralis muscleChemistryBlood flowKineticsInternal medicineHemoglobinCardiologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MedicineSkeletal musclePhysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of prior exercise on pulmonary O(2) uptake (Vo(2)(p)), leg blood flow (LBF), and muscle deoxygenation at the onset of heavy-intensity alternate-leg knee-extension (KE) exercise was examined. Seven subjects [27 (5) yr; mean (SD)] performed step transitions (n = 3; 8 min) from passive KE following no warm-up (HVY 1) and heavy-intensity (Delta50%, 8 min; HVY 2) KE exercise. Vo(2)(p) was measured breath-by-breath; LBF was measured by Doppler ultrasound at the femoral artery; and oxy (O(2)Hb)-, deoxy (HHb)-, and total (Hb(tot)) hemoglobin/myoglobin of the vastus lateralis muscle were measured continuously by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS; Hamamatsu NIRO-300). Phase 2 Vo(2)(p), LBF, and HHb data were fit with a monoexponential model. The time delay (TD) from exercise onset to an increase in HHb was also determined and an HHb effective time constant (HHb - MRT = TD + tau) was calculated. Prior heavy-intensity exercise resulted in a speeding (P < 0.05) of phase 2 Vo(2)(p) kinetics [HVY 1: 42 s (6); HVY 2: 37 s (8)], with no change in the phase 2 amplitude [HVY 1: 1.43 l/min (0.21); HVY 2: 1.48 l/min (0.21)] or amplitude of the Vo(2)(p) slow component [HVY 1: 0.18 l/min (0.08); HVY 2: 0.18 l/min (0.09)]. O(2)Hb and Hb(tot) were elevated throughout the on-transient following prior heavy-intensity exercise. The tauLBF [HVY 1: 39 s (7); HVY 2: 47 s (21); P = 0.48] and HHb-MRT [HVY 1: 23 s (4); HVY 2: 21 s (7); P = 0.63] were unaffected by prior exercise. However, the increase in HHb [HVY 1: 21 microM (10); HVY 2: 25 microM (10); P < 0.001] and the HHb-to-Vo(2)(p) ratio [(HHb/Vo(2)(p)) HVY 1: 14 microM x l(-1) x min(-1) (6); HVY 2: 17 microM x l(-1) x min(-1) (5); P < 0.05] were greater following prior heavy-intensity exercise. These results suggest that the speeding of phase 2 tauVo(2)(p) was the result of both elevated local O(2) availability and greater O(2) extraction evidenced by the greater HHb amplitude and HHb/Vo(2)(p) ratio following prior heavy-intensity exercise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207