Clinical Use of Permanent Pacemaker for Conversion of Intraatrial Reentry Tachycardia in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of the implanted atrial-based pacemaker to overdrive postsurgical intraatrial reentry tachycardia (IART) was evaluated in a large group of pediatric patients over a 14-year study period. The authors sought to determine the feasibility of this noninvasive technique in the management of this specialized population and to determine factors associated with successful conversion. They examined 128 manual overdrive attempts performed on 22 consecutive patients. There were 10 patients with post-Fontan repair, 7 with post-Mustard/Senning procedure, and 5 with miscellaneous lesion types. The number of IART episodes for overdrive pacing per patient ranged from 1 to 15. The first overdrive pacing attempt was successful in 63% (14/22) of the patients. The mean IART cycle length was 278 +/- 59 ms. The mean pacing rate for effective conversion of IART was 66 +/- 10% faster than the IART rate. By controlling for repeated measures for individual patients, three factors were found to be independently associated with a successful outcome: (1) lesion type other than Fontan surgery (P = 0.007), (2) lack of acceleration of IART with the overdrive attempt (P < 0.001), and (3) patient use of amiodarone with attempt (P = 0.005). There were three procedural complications: two inadvertent overdrive pacing episodes, and one episode of acceleration of IART cycle length and conduction resulting in need for cardioversion. Manual pacemaker overdrive conversion of IART is a useful adjunct in the management of postsurgical IART in the pediatric population and should be considered as an initial treatment option.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".