Molecular Recognition Forces between Immunoglobulin G and a Surface Protein Adhesin on Living <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report AFM measurements of binding events between immunoglobulin G (IgG) and protein A (PA) on the surface of live Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. The experiments were carried out with IgG molecules tethered via CM-amylose linkers to thiol SAMs on gold-coated AFM tips. For comparison, a model system consisting of protein A molecules tethered to thiol SAMs on gold-coated silicon substrates was also investigated. Histograms of binding forces for the PA-IgG bond showed comparable rupture forces of 59 and 64 pN for the model system and live bacteria, respectively. We suggest that linker molecules with a length comparable to the AFM tip radius should make it possible to detect specific binding events on the surface of live bacteria with a lateral resolution of a few tens of nanometers. Furthermore, because S. aureus is an important human pathogen, especially methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA), it is possible that additional virulence factors beyond PA can be probed using this technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".