MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028791242 · doi:10.3138/md.55.3.356

“Drowned in Rabelaisian Laughter”: Germans as Grotesque Comic Figures in the Plays of Tennessee Williams

2012· article· en· W2028791242 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Annette Saddik

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarnivalesqueMenagerieComicsGermanSensibilityLaughterArtLiteratureRomanticismDramaComedyBurlesqueArt historyDreamHistoryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: By the time he wrote The Night of the Iguana, in 1961, Tennessee Williams was increasingly favouring “fantastic” modes of presenting reality, relying on the more expressionistic and “plastic” kind of theatre that he had called for, as early as 1944, in his production notes to The Glass Menagerie. Williams’s interest in the fantastic modes of representation characteristic of German expressionism, in particular, along with his exaggerated, grotesque, and dream-like portrayal of Germans as symbolic characters in Iguana and several plays that would follow, shows that he was beginning to engage more fully a German sensibility that he would continue to develop in his later work. In The Gnädiges Fräulein (1966), A Lovely Sunday for Creve Coeur (1979), and Kirche, Küche, Kinder (1979), for example, Germans also function as grotesque comic figures: perverse, darkly humorous, excessive, and bawdy. The German characters in Williams’s plays are inspired by an aesthetic rooted in the traditions of German expressionism and Romanticism that influenced his writing, as he fused these styles with related sensibilities – the carnivalesque, the grotesque, camp – that are associated with the resistance and rebellion typical of his late plays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchFrench-language works237,207