MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Essential requirement for RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase Hakai in early embryonic development of <i>Drosophila</i>

2009· article· en· W2028801726 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Masako Kaido, Housei Wada, Masayo Shindo, Shigeo Hayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes to Cells · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHakai InstituteMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsBiologyUbiquitin ligaseCell biologyCadherinRing fingerMutantUbiquitinMorphogenesisSchneider 2 cellsDrosophila melanogasterEmbryonic stem cellGeneticsCellGeneRNA interferenceRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hakai is a RING finger type E3 ubiquitin ligase that is highly conserved in metazoans. Mammalian Hakai was shown to bind and ubiquitinate the intracellular domain of E-cadherin, and this activity is implicated in down-regulation of E-cadherin during v-Src-induced cellular transformation. To evaluate this model in vivo, we studied the function of the Drosophila homologue of Hakai. In cultured S2 cells, Drosophila Hakai and E-cadherin (Shotgun) formed a complex in a way distinct from the interaction described for mammalian counterparts. Hakai null mutants died during larval stages but this lethality could be offset by a HA-tagged Hakai construct. While zygotic Hakai function was dispensable for cell proliferation and differentiation in the wing disc epithelium, maternal Hakai mutants showed a variety of defects in epithelial integrity, including stochastic loss of E-cadherin expression and reduction of aPKC; defects in cell specification and cell migration were also observed. No increase of E-cadherin, however, was observed. Regulation of multiple target proteins under control of Hakai is, therefore, essential for early embryonic morphogenesis in Drosophila.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes to CellsSame topicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerFrench-language works237,207