MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028823069 · doi:10.1002/art.38493

A77: Clinical and Laboratory Features and Systemic Lupus Erythematous Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2K) at Onset and Follow Up in a Cohort of 109 Paediatric Lupus Patients From a Tertiary Level Centre in India

2014· article· en· W2028823069 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sujata Sawhney, Mehul Jariwala, Manjari Agarwal

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis & Rheumatology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystemic lupusMedicineSystemic lupus erythematosusCohortDiseaseTertiary careSystemic diseasePediatricsDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Purpose: Pediatric Rheumatology is a relatively new branch in India. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that has studied SLEDAI 2K in 109 children with SLE at onset, 6 months and annually thereafter for a median follow up of 38 months. Methods: In our unit, disease activity of all children with lupus is captured on disease assessment proformas and completed every 3–6 months. This form captures demographics, clinical assessment, lab results and therapy. All paediatric lupus patients (diagnosed per the ACR criteria 1992) with disease onset <18 years seen at our unit from 2001 were included. The clinical and laboratory features at presentation and the SLEDAI 2K was captured at onset, 6 months and thereafter annually. We chose SLE 2K as an outcome measure as it captures new, recurrent and ongoing disease activity (). The aims of the study were To detail the presentation of cSLE from India To study the SLEDAI 2K at onset and follow up To compare the data from India to that available from the West. available from the West. Results: Demographics: 109 patients identified, 90 were females. The median age at onset was 11.4 (3.4‐18) years and median age at diagnosis 12.1 (3.5‐19). The median duration of follow up was 38 months (3‐152). Clinical presentation at onset: As in table . Nine children had MAS at onset. Table 1. Feature % positive Constitutional fever 83 arthralgia 80 Fatigue 70 myalgia 55 weight loss 43 Lupus features malar rash 62 arthritis 60 alopecia 59 mucositis 56 photosensitivity 39 vasculitis 38 nephritis 35 lymphadenopathy 33 neurologic 17 effusion 14 Labs at onset: ANA positive in 97%, DsDNA in 80%, low complements seen in 84%. Anemia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia present in 37, 31, and 28% respectively. APL antibodies positive in 28%. SLEDAI 2K at onset and follow up: Table SLEDAI 2K in a Cohort of cSLE Patients at Onset and 5 Year Follow Up disease duration months no of patients Median SLEDAI % pts with SLEDAI <4 SLEDAI Range 0 109 16 2 1 to 52 6 107 2 56 0 to 28 12 97 2 66 0 to 16 24 77 2 70 0 to 28 36 58 2 71 0 to 24 48 44 0 75 0 to 50 60 37 2 70 0 to 12 Median SLEDAI 2K 16 at onset and subsequently all median SLEDAIs were <4. Patients with inactive disease (SLEDAI 2K <4) () 70–75% after the 6 months. Nineteen patients had a new organ involvement 6 months after disease onset, eight nephritis. Follow up: 54 patients had no flare, 27–1 flare and 28 patients had 2–5 flares each. One patient died, no patient had renal failure/transplant. Seven patients had hypothyroidism and 1 had celiac disease. Comparison with Western data: Of 256 patients with cSLE described from Toronto, the mean SLEDAI was 13 at onset and 2.9 at one year, very similar to our study (). The cohort from Israel studied 102 patients with a higher SLEDAI of 17 at onset, 7.6 at 5 years with 5 patients in renal failure (). Conclusion: 80% of patients had fever and 33% had nephritis at onset. The disease burden at onset was high; median SLEDAI fell to <4 within 6 months and remained low through follow up. 17% had new organ involvement after 6 months. 50% had no disease flare. The disease burden is similar to that described in the West.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis & RheumatologySame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207