MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028838204 · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-10-02330-6

Computing matrix representations

2010· article· en· W2028838204 on OpenAlexafffund
Vahid Dabbaghian

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Computation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFinite Group Theory Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversitySimon Fraser University
FundersSFU Community Trust Endowment FundSimon Fraser University
KeywordsMathematicsCharacter (mathematics)Abelian groupAlgebra over a fieldRepresentation (politics)Matrix (chemical analysis)Group (periodic table)Matrix representationDegree (music)Irreducible representationArithmeticCombinatoricsPure mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be a finite group and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="chi"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> χ </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\chi</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> a faithful irreducible character for <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . Earlier papers by the first author describe techniques for computing a matrix representation for <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> which affords <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="chi"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> χ </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\chi</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> whenever the degree <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="chi left-parenthesis 1 right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi> χ </mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\chi (1)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is less than <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="32"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mn>32</mml:mn> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">32</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . In the present paper we introduce a new, fast method which can be applied in the important case where <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is perfect and the socle <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="s o c left-parenthesis upper G slash upper Z left-parenthesis upper G right-parenthesis right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mi>o</mml:mi> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">soc(G/Z(G))</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> over its centre is abelian. In particular, this enables us to extend the general construction of representations to all cases where <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="chi left-parenthesis 1 right-parenthesis less-than-or-equal-to 100"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi> χ </mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo> ≤ </mml:mo> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\chi (1)\leq 100</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . The improved algorithms have been implemented in the new version 3.0.1 of the GAP package REPSN by the first author.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics of ComputationSame topicFinite Group Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207