MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028865289 · doi:10.1021/la034056t

Cyclic CVD Modification of Straight Pore Alumina Membranes

2003· article· en· W2028865289 on OpenAlexaff
Hatem M. Alsyouri, Ch. Langheinrich, Y. S. Lin, Zhibin Ye, Shiping Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembranePermeationChemical vapor depositionPermeancePorosityChemical engineeringWater vaporChemistryPurgeGas separationMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alumina oxide was deposited in the straight nanosize pores of Anopore alumina membrane by the alternative introduction of trimethylaluminum (TMA) and water vapor to the membrane pores. The chemical vapor deposition (CVD) modification was conducted under two different schemes: (1) cyclic CVD with residual pressure and (2) cyclic CVD with purge. The membranes were characterized by single gas helium permeance and water vapor/oxygen multiple gas permeation. Helium gas permeation results show that the modification by the residual pressure scheme caused greater reduction in the pore size than porosity, suggesting the deposition of alumina in a fractal structure in the Anopore membrane pores. Such a structure is caused by combined homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions taking place respectively on the pore wall and randomly in the pores. The membranes modified with CVD under the purge scheme exhibited greater reduction in porosity than the pore size, indicating that the alumina in the latter case was deposited on the pore wall in an atomic layer fashion. The structure in the latter case is caused by homogeneous reactions taking place on the pore wall. Membranes modified under the purge scheme exhibited improved water vapor/oxygen separation properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicMesoporous Materials and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207