Why is Orthostatic Tolerance Lower in Women than in Men? Renal and Cardiovascular Responses to Simulated Microgravity and the Role of Midodrine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to microgravity induces cardiovascular deconditioning, manifested by orthostatic intolerance (OI). We assessed the renal, cardioendocrine, and cardiovascular responses of women and men to simulated microgravity to examine the impact of gender on OI. METHODS: Fifteen healthy female and 14 healthy male subjects were given a constant diet for 3 to 5 days, after which they underwent a tilt-stand test (pre-TST) and began 14 to 16 days of head-down tilt bed rest (HDTB), followed by a repeat tilt-stand test (post-TST). Female subjects began HDTB so that the post-TST was at the same time in their menstrual cycle as their pre-TST. Twenty-four-hour urine collections (daily), hormonal measurements, plethysmography, and cardiovascular system identification were performed. RESULTS: The times to presyncope were significantly different for men and women before (p= .005) and after HDTB (p= .001), with all of the women but only 50% of the men experiencing presyncope during the pre-TST (p= .002) and all of the women but only 64% of the men experiencing presyncope during the post-TST. At baseline, the following differences between women and men were observed: women had higher serum aldosterone levels (p = .02), higher parasympathetic responsiveness (p = .01), lower sympathetic responsiveness (p = .05), and lower venous compliance (p = .05). Several parameters changed with HDTB in both men and women. In a double-blinded randomized trial, midodrine (5 mg orally) or placebo given to female subjects 1 hour before post-TST was ineffective in preventing 01. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the frequency of OI is higher in women than in men and is not modified by midodrine at the dose used. This increased susceptibility is likely secondary to intrinsic basal differences in the activity of volume-mediated parasympathetic and adrenergic systems and in venous tone. Thus, approaches to reduce OI in women are likely to differ from those effective in men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".