Disease severity in siblings with cystic fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since cross-infection occurs between cystic fibrosis (CF) siblings, we hypothesized that subsequent siblings may acquire respiratory pathogens at an earlier age and have a more severe course of pulmonary disease. We studied a retrospective cohort of 31 sibling pairs from the CF database at the Hospital for Sick Children. Kaplan-Meier curves and modified log-rank tests were used to test sibling differences in age of acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), Staphylococcus aureus (SA), or any positive culture. Differences in disease severity outcomes were explored. Older siblings were more likely to have both SA and any CF pathogen first isolated from respiratory culture at an older age than younger siblings (P = 0.0050 and P = 0.0008, respectively, by modified log-rank tests). However, more of the older siblings were positive on first culture at time of diagnosis, introducing an age-of-diagnosis bias. Hospitalization rates, courses of oral antibiotics, FEV(1) % predicted, and weight and height measurements were not better in the older children. No differences in clinical parameters were found between older and younger siblings. The apparent finding of younger age at first isolation of pathogens from respiratory cultures in younger siblings is likely because many older siblings were already infected with these organisms at time of diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".