Combination of Surgical Subcision and Intralesional Corticosteroid Injection As a Cost-Effective and Minimally Invasive Treatment for Postoperative Adhesive Thyroidectomy Scars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative adhesive symptoms (swallowing difficulty or pulling sensation during neck extension) are one of the major complications of thyroidectomy. Moreover, adhesive scars are often visible and cause cosmetic concerns. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined treatment with surgical subcision and intralesional corticosteroid injection for postoperative adhesive thyroidectomy scars. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 16 Korean patients with postoperative adhesive thyroidectomy scars treated with three sessions of surgical subcision and intralesional corticosteroid injection. RESULTS: The Vancouver Scar Scale score decreased significantly after treatment (P < .001). Follow-up revealed that six of the 16 patients (37.5%) had clinical improvement of 51% to 75%, six (37.5%) had moderate clinical improvement of 26% to 50%, and three (18.8%) had improvement of 76% to 100%; one patient (6.3%) demonstrated minimal to no improvement. After three sessions of treatment, the mean clinical improvement grade was 2.68, which means moderate to marked improvement compared to before treatment. Post-treatment erythema was observed in most patients, and notable bruising after treatment observed in five patients resolved spontaneously within 7 days. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with surgical subcision and intralesional corticosteroid injection is a cost-effective and minimally invasive treatment for postoperative adhesive thyroidectomy scars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".