Las conmemoraciones de los bicentenarios y el liberalismo hispánico: ¿historia intelectual o historia intelectualizada?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay is a reflection on three topics that are different but interrelated. Firstly, it deals with the bicentennial commemorations, with some of the implications of every commemoration and, mainly, with what it is exactly that we are commemorating in Spain and Latin America. Secondly, this essay establishes the relation between bicentennial commemorations and liberalism, and considers the reasons why «el liberalismo hispanico» will play an important role in these commemorations. Lastly, this essay is a critique of some contemporary historiographic tendencies or schools that, beyond their pertinence in many aspects, put into practice methodologies in the authors view , ending up intellectualizing This content downloaded from 40.77.167.13 on Wed, 20 Jul 2016 04:46:10 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Roberto Brew Las conmemoraciones de los bicentenarios y el liberalismo hispanico the political history of the Spanish-American world of the first quarter of the 19th century (and beyond). This has consequences for the bicentennials, for «el liberalismo hispanico» and, in the end, for understanding this period of Spanish and Latin America history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".