MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029198020 · doi:10.1504/ijehv.2014.062807

Intelligent power management of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, part I: real-time optimum SOC trajectory builder

2014· article· en· W2029198020 on OpenAlexaff
Mahyar Vajedi, Maryyeh Chehrehsaz, Nasser L. Azad

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrajectoryAutomotive engineeringPlug-inElectricityDynamic programmingController (irrigation)PropulsionFuel efficiencyEngineeringPower (physics)Power managementComputer scienceSimulationElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Offering better fuel economy and lower emissions than conventional vehicles, plug–in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) are promising near–term options for high efficiency, 'sustainable' transportation. It has recently been found that these efficiency benefits can be further improved with access to upcoming trip and driving conditions. This study is organised into two parts: in part I, upcoming trip data is used to find the optimal SOC trajectory of our PHEV model that will help minimise the total cost of electricity and fossil fuel. In part II, the optimum SOC trajectory is applied within the real–time controller to optimally distribute propulsion power between two energy sources. Autonomie was used to develop and implement a high fidelity PHEV model. The optimal SOC trajectory which has been found by real–time optimisation technique is in close agreement with the global optimum solution of Dynamic Programming. Moreover, the real–time technique is much less computationally expensive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Electric and Hybrid VehiclesSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207