MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029265544 · doi:10.1094/pdis-91-7-0908a

Occurrence of Potato Cyst Nematode, <i>Globodera rostochiensis</i>, on Potato in the Saint-Amable Region, Quebec, Canada

2007· article· en· W2029265544 on OpenAlexaffabout
F. Sun, Stephen E. Miller, S. Wood, Marie‐José Côté

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPotato cyst nematodeGlobodera rostochiensisSolanum tuberosumStyletNematodeQuarantineBotanyHorticultureAnatomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. subsp. tuberosum) is one of the most important food crops in Canada. Potato cyst nematodes, Globodera rostochiensis (Wollenweber, 1923) Skarbilovich, 1959 and Globodera pallida (Stone, 1973) Behrens, 1975, are considered the most economically important nematode pests of potatoes worldwide and are the subject of strict quarantine regulations in many countries including Canada. In Canada, G. rostochiensis was found in the Saanich Peninsula of Vancouver Island, British Columbia and both G. rostochiensis and G. pallida are present on the island of Newfoundland (3). During August of 2006, soil and roots of potato plants collected from a 19.2-ha field in the Saint-Amable region, Quebec, were submitted to the Nematology Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa. Golden, spherical-shaped cysts were found associated with the roots and were also extracted from the soil. The nematodes recovered were identified by morphological and morphometric analysis and DNA analysis. Measurements and morphological observation of 60 second-stage juveniles were as follows: body length = 427.4 ± 22.0 (395 to 495) μm; stylet length = 21.3 ± 1.2 (18 to 23) μm; distance from stylet base to dorsal esophageal gland opening = 5.5 ± 0.9 (3.5 to 7.0) μm; tail length = 46.7 ± 3.7 (36 to 58) μm; hyaline tail terminus = 21.1 ± 3.1 (13 to 27) μm; and the shape of stylet basal knobs varied from rounded to lateral flattened. Observations for 35 mature cysts were: number of cuticular ridges between anus and vulval fenestra = 21 ± 6 (12 to 31); fenestral length = 18.4 ± 3.6 (11 to 30) μm; distance from anus to the edge of fenestra = 81.1 ± 30.4 (29 to 165) μm; Granek's ratio = 4.4 ± 1.6 (1.8 to 6.0), with parallel wavy cuticular ridges between anus and vulval fenestra. These observations conformed to the published description of G. rostochiensis (2). Additionally, the identification was supported by the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism pattern of the ITS-1 region amplified using primers 18S (5'-TTGATTACGTCCCTGCCCTTT-3') and rDNA1.58S (5'-ACGAGCCGAGTGATCCACCG-3') and digested with BstU I and a PCR product specific for G. rostochiensis (1). Sequence of a 1,190-bp PCR fragment of ribosomal DNA amplified using primers rDNA1 (5'-TTGATTACGTCCCTGCCCTTT-3') and rDNA2 (5'- TTTCACTCGCCGTTACTAAGG-3') showed 99.0 to 100% identity with published DNA sequences of the same genomic region for G. rostochiensis (4). The sequence is available from the authors upon request. The origin of the introduction of G. rostochiensis into Saint-Amable is unknown. An intensive soil survey is underway to define the infested area, and strict quarantine measures have been taken to prevent further spread of G. rostochiensis. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of the occurrence of G. rostochiensis in Quebec, Canada. References: (1) A. Fullaondo et al. Nematology 1:157, 1999. (2) A. M. Golden et al. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 39:64, 1972. (3) A. R. Stone et al. Plant Dis. Rep. 61:590, 1977. (4) S. A. Subbotin et al. Nematology 2:591, 2000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207