MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029300191 · doi:10.1109/isaf.2008.4693821

New lead-free piezoelectric ceramics derived from the K0.5Na0.5NbO3-AgNbO3 solid solution system

2008· article· en· W2029300191 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Lei, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiezoelectricityPhysicsMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lead-based ferroelectrics, such as Pb(Zr,Ti)O3and Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3[1], [2], are widely used for piezoelectric actuators, sensors and transducers due to their excellent piezoelectric properties. However, recent concern about the toxicity of lead requires more environmentally friendly lead-free piezoelectric materials. Potassium sodium niobate (K0.5Na0.5NbO3, KNN) has been recognized as one of the promising candidates for lead-free piezoelectric host materials. Hot pressed KNN ceramics have been reported to have good piezoelectric properties of d33=160 pC/N and kp=45%, along with a high Curie temperature (TC ~420 °C) [3], [4]. However, KNN ceramics are difficult to sinter by the conventional solid state method and subject to the deliquescence problem. On the other hand, silver niobate (AgNbO3, AN) has attracted renewed interest because it is a lead-free ferroelectric with a gh TC of 360 °C [5]. The objective of this work is to investigate this new lead-free solid solution system of (1-χ)K0.5Na0.5NbO3-χAgNbO3[(1-χ)KNN-χAN], in order to improve the piezoelectric properties by enhancing the sinterability of KNN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207