EFFECTIVE BLADDER SPARING THERAPY WITH INTRA-ARTERIAL CISPLATIN AND RADIOTHERAPY FOR LOCALIZED BLADDER CANCER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of the organ preserving strategy of intra-arterial cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for localized bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bladder preservation has been pursued over the decades in treatment regimens featuring radiotherapy alone or in conjunction with single or multiagent chemotherapy. The chemotherapy has consisted almost exclusively of intravenously administered drugs. There are theoretical and clinical data demonstrating a higher concentration of cisplatin within tumors following intra-arterial as opposed to intravenous delivery. This study was performed to evaluate whether this increased concentration would enhance radiosensitization and thereby increase the success of bladder preservation. RESULTS: We report on our prospectively collected experience during 15 years of treating 200 patients with localized bladder cancer using this regimen of 3 courses of intra-arterial cisplatin integrated with pelvic radiotherapy and reserving cystectomy for salvage as required. We report on the efficacy in terms of complete response rate, ultimate tumor-free bladder preservation, overall survival and patterns of failure. We detail the acute and chronic toxicity observed to date. CONCLUSIONS: This strategy has resulted in a durable high complete response rate and overall tumor-free bladder preservation rate of 75% while maintaining a survival comparable to that achieved with cystectomy. These results corroborate the hypothesis that intra-arterial administration of cisplatin enhances radiosensitization during pelvic radiotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".