At The Dramatists’ Table: The Climax and Decline of a Mannerist Cuisine in England, 1580-1630
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le théâtre de Shakespeare et de ses contemporains « regorge » de séquences où la gastronomie est mise en scène. Pourquoi ? L’une des raisons est que ces dramaturges écrivent à une période où le style culinaire à la mode arrive à son apogée et entame son déclin, c’est-à-dire que le moment est propice aux rapprochements entre excès culinaires et corruption morale. Cette étude aborde le style culinaire de la période tel que le révèlent les livres de cuisine. Par les méthodes quantitative et qualitative, l’analyse définit ce style et démontre les liens étroits entre le domaine culinaire et les autres arts, notamment la peinture, l’art des jardins et l’architecture. S’il est vrai que le style maniériste en Angleterre — aussi bien pour ce qui est des arts décoratifs que pour la cuisine — diffère quelque peu du maniérisme continental, il reste néanmoins une variante reconnaissable du modèle européen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".