MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low central venous oxygen saturation is associated with increased mortality in critically ill dogs

2011· article· en· W2029364419 on OpenAlexaff
Galina M. Hayes, Ky L. Mathews, Sarah E. Boston, Cate Dewey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Small Animal Practice · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaCentral venous pressureOxygenConfidence intervalOxygen saturationOdds ratioVenous bloodInternal medicineCardiologyBlood pressureHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To investigate relationships between central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO(2)) and survival to hospital discharge in dogs. Central venous oxygen saturation is an accessible measure of the balance between systemic oxygen delivery and consumption. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study, enrolling 126 client-owned dogs with central venous catheters. Central venous oxygen saturation was measured over the 24 hours following intensive care unit admission. Poor outcome was defined as death or euthanasia performed for moribund status. Regression analysis identified independent predictors of non-survival and physiologic parameters associated with central venous oxygen saturation. Area under the receiver operator curve analysis identified a cut-off point of central venous oxygen saturation, below which central venous oxygen saturation decrease was associated with increased mortality risk. RESULTS: Mortality risk was 30·9%. Low central venous oxygen saturation was associated with poor outcome (P<0·05). Area under the receiver operator curve analysis selected a central venous oxygen saturation of 68% as the point below which a fall in central venous oxygen saturation was associated with increased mortality risk. For each 10% drop in central venous oxygen saturation below 68%, odds of non-survival increased by 2·66 times (P=0·0002, 95% confidence interval of odds ratio=1·45 to 4·85). Central venous oxygen saturation was equivalent to lactate in predicting non-survival. Predictors of central venous oxygen saturation (packed cell volume, mean arterial blood pressure, fever, % arterial haemoglobin saturation as measured by pulse oximeter) were consistent with hypothesised physiologic mechanisms. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Central venous oxygen saturation was a strong mortality predictor. Further work is needed to determine if therapy targeting central venous oxygen saturation can reduce mortality in canine intensive care unit patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Small Animal PracticeSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207