MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029389487 · doi:10.1097/ico.0b013e318181a84f

Infliximab for the Treatment of Refractory Progressive Sterile Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis Associated With Late Corneal Perforation: 3-Year Follow-Up

2008· article· en· W2029389487 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCornea · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabSurgeryPerforationVisual acuityRefractory (planetary science)Corneal perforationInternal medicineTumor necrosis factor alpha

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To report a case of refractory progressive sterile peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) that resulted in late corneal perforation, despite good initial response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor infliximab. METHODS: Review of the clinical course of a patient with progressive PUK treated with infliximab infusions of 3 mg/kg intravenously. RESULTS: A 72-year-old man presented with a visual acuity of 20/200 and a 5-month history of a progressive sterile PUK. More than 90% of the surface area previously unresponsive to 8 weeks of high-dose systemic steroid therapy healed within 1 week of the first infusion. After his second infusion, best-corrected visual acuity improved to 20/30(+2), with 2 small epithelial defects remaining. However, the remaining unhealed cornea thinned to an area of microperforation 6 weeks after his third dose, prompting an increase in dose frequency to every 4 weeks. One month after his fifth infusion, the area of ulceration healed completely. After his seventh infusion, the patient developed a deep venous thrombosis and infliximab was discontinued. After 10 months of remission, clear corneal cataract surgery was performed. Three years after initial presentation, he remains in remission with a corrected visual acuity of 20/20. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab was effective in rapidly arresting the progression of a sterile PUK in our patient. Optimal dosing for infliximab in PUK has not been established, and increasing dose frequency to every 4 weeks may be necessary. Despite a progressive PUK resulting in corneal perforation, treatment with infliximab and subsequent visual rehabilitation can result in sustained remission and an excellent visual outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it