Müllerian Adenosarcomas With Unusual Growth Patterns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uterine adenosarcomas are uncommon mixed Müllerian neoplasms, most commonly arising in the uterine corpus. A new Federation of International Gynecologic Organization staging system for these tumors has recently been implemented. This staging system is an improvement on the earlier generic application of the 1988 Federation of International Gynecologic Organization staging system for endometrial cancer to adenosarcoma. Herein, we report 3 uterine adenosarcomas with unusual features. For 2 of these, no specific staging guidelines are provided by either the earlier or, more importantly, the new staging system. The first case is of an adenosarcoma arising in the eutopic endometrium with involvement of underlying adenomyosis without myometrial invasion; the second originated in a mural adenomyoma in the absence of eutopic endometrial involvement; and the third case encompassed synchronous endometrial and extrauterine (peritoneal) neoplasms. Such cases are rare, and there is insufficient evidence to be definitive about staging. Thus, we suggest a descriptive reporting strategy for adenosarcomas with these unusual features. We also propose a reporting nomenclature for such cases to ensure standardization such that they can be adequately recorded in synoptic reporting protocols. This will facilitate reliable data collection such that an evidence-based staging system for these scenarios may be derived.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".