MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Suramin inhibits oxidant signalling in tobacco suspension‐cultured cells

2002· article· en· W2029400804 on OpenAlexafffund
Godfrey P. Miles, Marcus A. Samuel, B. E. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Cell & Environment · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsSuraminMAPK/ERK pathwayCell biologyReactive oxygen speciesChemistrySignal transductionHydrogen peroxideReceptorOxidative stressBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Plant cells respond to ultraviolet radiation and other oxidant‐generating agents by mobilizing cellular defences, but the signal network linking perception of redox perturbation with defence remains unknown. Irradiation of tobacco suspension‐cultured cells with UVC was found to induce the activation of a specific MAPK 46 (salicylic acid‐induced protein kinase) within 1 min. To explore where UVC and other oxidants might initially act to trigger this signal response, we employed suramin, a non‐membrane‐permeable reagent that interferes with membrane receptor‐mediated signalling in mammalian cells. Pre‐treatment of tobacco cells with suramin strongly attenuated the UVC‐induced activation of MAPK 46 in a concentration‐dependent manner. Suramin was also able to interdict both ozone‐ and hydrogen peroxide‐induced activation of MAPK 46 , indicating that reactive oxygen species (ROS) signalling to the MAPK cascade in general may be initiated at the cell membrane, perhaps through oxidative activation of membrane receptors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Cell & EnvironmentSame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207