Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and age of onset for Alzheimer's disease in a bi-ethnic sample
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association between the Apolipoprotein-E epsilon4 allele (APOE epsilon4) and age of disease onset in a bi-ethnic sample of community dwelling Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of AD patients evaluated at a University-affiliated outpatient memory disorders clinic. SUBJECTS: A clinic-based cohort of white non-Hispanic (WNH; n=601) and white Hispanic (WH; n = 359) patients diagnosed with possible or probable AD according to NINCDS-ADRDA diagnostic criteria. MEASURES: Global cognitive functioning of the subjects was evaluated using the Mini-mental State Exam. The age of onset of AD was calculated from the patient's current age minus the reported duration of disease obtained from a knowledgeable family member. RESULTS: A significant relationship was discovered between APOE epsilon4 and age of onset for WNH, with lower ages of onset among patients carrying the epsilon4/epsilon4 and epsilon3/epsilon4 genotypes in relation to patients with the epsilon3/epsilon3 genotype. The results revealed a more modest effect for APOE genotype in the WH cohort, with a lower age of onset witnessed among epsilon4 positive patients (epsilon2/epsilon4, epsilon3/epsilon4 and epsilon4/epsilon4 genotypes) in comparison to epsilon4 negative patients (epsilon2/epsilon2, epsilon2/epsilon3 and epsilon3/epsilon3 genotypes). CONCLUSION: The association between the epsilon4 allele and earlier age of onset was more pronounced in WNH compared to WH patients, suggesting the impact of APOE polymorphism on clinical phenotype may be different for distinct ethnic groups in the U.S.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".