Partial liquid ventilation decreases serum tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations in a rat acid aspiration lung injury model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the hypothesis that partial liquid ventilation (PLV) with perfluorocarbon would decrease serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations in a rat acid aspiration lung injury model. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled animal study. SETTINGS: Research laboratory in a university setting. SUBJECTS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with intratracheal perflubron or control mechanical ventilation beginning 30 mins after acid aspiration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PLV with perfluorocarbon compared with control ventilation resulted in significantly greater mean arterial blood pressures at 3 and 4 hrs and greater arterial Po2 at all times. Serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha at 2, 3, and 4 hrs was significantly less than that observed in the control group (4-hr values: 80+/-64 pg/mL vs. 658+/-688 pg/mL; p<.05), although no significant difference in tracheal fluid tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations (1425+/-1347 pg/mL vs. 2219+/-1933 pg/mL) was found. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the effects of PLV with perfluorocarbon can extend beyond improvements in pulmonary physiology and that PLV may be beneficial in reducing systemic sequelae of acute lung injury and inflammation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".