Rheology of fiber suspensions in viscoelastic media: Experiments and model predictions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rheological behavior of suspensions of short glass fibers in different fluids has been studied. Transient tests on presheared samples of fiber suspensions in Boger fluids showed that orientation of fibers not only depends on the strain, but also on the rate-of-strain. The experimental results show that upon increasing fiber concentration and/or fiber aspect ratio, the steady shear material functions of fiber suspensions increase at low shear rates, whereas at high shear rates, these material functions approach those of the matrix and become almost independent of fiber characteristics. A rheological model based on the modified Jeffery equation for the fiber motion and a Hookean energy model, formulated within the GENERIC framework, for the matrix has been developed to quantitatively predict experimental data for suspensions of fibers in different fluids. A quantitative comparison of experimental data with model predictions shows the ability of the model to predict the rheological behavior of fiber suspensions in viscoelastic media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it