MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029433937 · doi:10.1021/ie049635n

Hydrodynamics Modeling of Bioclogging in Waste Gas Treating Trickle-Bed Bioreactors

2004· article· en· W2029433937 on OpenAlexaff
Ion Iliuta, Maria C. Iliuta, Faı̈çal Larachi

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloggingBioreactorTRICKLETrickle-bed reactorBiomass (ecology)Volume (thermodynamics)ChemistryPressure dropAerationPulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementMechanicsGeologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Removal of hazardous organic compounds from waste gases in co-current gas−liquid downflow trickle-bed bioreactors can result in bed clogging as a result of biomass accumulation. Such biomass growth permanently reshapes the bed pore structure and leads to progressive bed obstruction often accompanied by an increase in pressure drop. A predictive dynamic model linking two-phase hydrodynamics to the space-time distribution of bioclogging and biokinetics in trickle-bed bioreactors for waste gas treatment was developed on the basis of the volume-average mass, momentum, and species balance equations coupled with classical diffusion/bioreaction equations to describe biofilm evolution. The model, which includes effects of liquid holdup/layer and biomass loss (via biomass decay and physical shearing), could be very helpful for determining the operating conditions that reduce biological clogging. Toluene degradation using biodegrading microbes immobilized on diatomaceous earth biological support media was chosen for a case study to illustrate the influence of biomass accumulation on bioreactor hydrodynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207