Fast Soft Decision Quantization With Adaptive Preselection and Dynamic Trellis Graph
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soft decision quantization (SDQ) is an efficient tool for video coding to achieve coefficient-level rate-distortion optimized quantization (RDOQ) with a 6%-8% bit rate saving. However, the software and hardware implementations of SDQ suffer from either high complexity or low throughput capacity due to complex Viterbi trellis search and sequential processing in context-adaptive binary arithmetic coding. In this paper, a fast SDQ algorithm is proposed to decrease the number of trellis stages to decrease the complexity and to break the data dependency in optimal SDQ. First, preselection is performed according to hard decision quantization results by intelligent coding cost estimation and comparison, during which some coefficients are judged to be safely excluded from trellis search, resulting in considerable complexity reduction. Second, a dynamic trellis graph with flexible structure is constructed according to the unsafe nonzero coefficients to accelerate the remaining partial Viterbi search. Third, a dynamic threshold selection model is proposed for adaptive thresholding to increase the probability of right preselection under a constraint on a predefined maximal probability of wrong preselection. The experimental results show that compared with optimal SDQ, the proposed algorithm can at least reduce the computation complexity by 50%-80%, memory accesses by 75%-82%, and the sequential processing latency in hardware implementation by 87.25%, with less than 0.4% Bjøntegaard bit rate increment when a maximum of three unsafe coefficients are kept for trellis search in one block. This paper is suitable for high-throughput hardware and computation-sensitive software implementations for SDQ and RDOQ for H.264/Advanced Video Coding and High Efficiency Video Coding standards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".