MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029606813 · doi:10.1080/02726351.2010.536302

Heat Transfer Between Gas-Solid Phases Within Packed Particle Beds

2011· article· en· W2029606813 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueParticulate Science And Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNusselt numberMechanicsAirflowHeat transferHeat transfer coefficientNatural convectionParticle (ecology)ThermodynamicsMaterials scienceReynolds numberThermocoupleWork (physics)ConvectionMeteorologyTurbulencePhysicsGeologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new method is presented to determine the internal heat convection coefficients for air flowing steadily through a bed of spherical particles. In this technique, a series of step change experiments are carried out on beds of glass beads of different diameters that are subjected to a temperature step change in the inlet airflow at different flow rates. Thermocouples are arranged along the particle bed height to record the particle temperature distribution and inlet/outlet air temperatures at any time. A theoretical energy analysis of particle beds to determine the convective heat transfer coefficients is performed for the short time duration when the experimental data show that temperature distribution along the airflow direction at any time is almost spatially linear and the temperature at any specific position is almost temporally linear. The energy change of the particle beds within this time duration is shown to be a function of the heat convection coefficient. Therefore, a new correlation, in terms of Nusselt number versus Reynolds number (, with uncertainty limits at 95% confidence level, is developed and found to be in good agreement with most other correlations developed by other researchers for beds of similar spherical particles. Keywords: convection coefficientNusselt numberReynolds numberspherical particlestep changetemperature distributiontheoretical model Acknowledgments This work was supported by Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it