MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029607675

Role of IFN-gamma in allograft rejection.

2002· article· en· W2029607675 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Hidalgo, Philip F. Halloran

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferon gammaImmunologyCTL*Immune systemCytokineMajor histocompatibility complexTransplantationInflammationMedicineBiologyCD8Internal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interferon (IFN)-gamma is a cytokine produced mostly by activated T cells and NK cells that has complex effects on immune and nonimmune cells. IFN-gamma plays important roles in inflammation, usually in synergy with other cytokines, such as IL-1beta and TNF-alpha. The uniqueness of IFN-gamma lies in its ability to induce major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression in many tissues, making it particularly relevant to transplantation. The results of graft rejection in the absence of IFN-gamma show that IFN-gamma modulates but is not essential for the allogeneic responses, suppressing generation of CTL. In vivo IFN-gamma has a protective role early in the response to vascularized organ allografts: transplants in mice have a tendency to develop necrosis when IFN-gamma is not available, apparently by failure of the microcirculation. The lack of IFN-gamma greatly reduces the induction of MHC in organ allografts, and it is possible that this is indirectly related to the protective effect of IFN-gamma. Nevertheless IFN-gamma also promotes graft vessel disease later in the course ofthe transplant. Thus IFN-gamma has diverse and potentially contradictory effects on organ allograft survival, acting both on the immune system and on the graft itself, the net effect depending on the graft type and the time post-transplant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207