MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029643933 · doi:10.1007/s00024-014-0850-7

Spatio-Temporal Complex Markov Chain (SCMC) Model Using Directed Graphs: Earthquake Sequencing

2014· article· en· W2029643933 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Cavers, Kris Vasudevan

Bibliographic record

VenuePure and Applied Geophysics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chainComputer scienceGraphDirected graphEvent (particle physics)AlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We construct a directed graph to represent a Markov chain of global earthquake sequences and analyze the statistics of transition probabilities linked to earthquake zones. We use a simplified plate boundary template for earthquake zonation. We generalize this Markov chain of earthquake sequences by including the recurrent events in space and time for each event in the record-breaking sense. The record-breaking recurrent events provide the basis for redefining the weights for the state-to-state transition probabilities. We use a distance-dependent look-up array for each zone to assign the distance-dependent weights for the recurring events. We present here details of the method and the preliminary results on the structure and properties of the directed graphs corresponding to a Markov chain model without and with the inclusion of record-breaking events. The underlying directed graph provides the framework for earthquake sequencing. We examine the properties of the directed graph without and with the inclusion of recurrences. We consider the present method easily expandable for forecasting work as catalogues are routinely updated with seismic events and, also, widely applicable to a study of both the regional and global seismicity. We demonstrate the applicability of the directed graph approach to forecasting using some of the properties of graphs that represent the Markov chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePure and Applied GeophysicsSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207