MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029734909 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m407949200

Methylation of H3 Lysine 4 at Euchromatin Promotes Sir3p Association with Heterochromatin

2004· article· en· W2029734909 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helena Santos-Rosa, Andrew J. Bannister, Pierre-Marie Dehé, Vincent Géli, Tony Kouzarides

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuchromatinHeterochromatinHistone H3Heterochromatin protein 1EZH2BiologyChromatinMethylationGeneticsHistoneDNA methylationSubtelomereHistone methyltransferaseTelomereDNAGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Set1p methylates lysine 4 of histone H3 and can activate transcription by recruiting the chromatin-remodeling factor Isw1p. In addition, Lys-4-methylated H3 is required for maintenance of silencing at the telomeres, rDNA, and HML locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The molecular mechanism underlying the role of Set1p in silencing is not known. Here we report that euchromatic methylation of H3 Lys-4 is necessary to maintain silencing at specific heterochromatic sites. Inactivation of Set1p catalytic activity or mutation of H3 Lys-4 leads to decreased binding of the silent information regulator Sir3p at heterochromatic sites. Concomitantly, there is an increase in the amount of Sir3p bound to genes located in subtelomeric regions. Consistent with this result is the finding that in vitro, Sir3p preferentially binds histone H3 tails when methylation is absent at H3 Lys-4, a situation found in heterochromatin. The inability of Sir3p to bind methylated H3 Lys-4 tails suggests a model whereby H3 Lys-4 methylation prevents Sir3p association at euchromatic sites and therefore concentrates Sir3p at unmodified, heterochromatic regions of the genome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations117
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207