MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Operative management of pediatric scaphoid fracture nonunion.

2003· article· en· W2029742254 on OpenAlexaff
Merv Letts

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNonunionBone graftingScaphoid fractureSurgeryFixation (population genetics)Orthopedic surgeryInternal fixationRadiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fractures of the scaphoid are uncommon childhood injuries that can usually be successfully managed by standard immobilization techniques. However, scaphoid waist fractures are less frequent in children and may proceed to nonunion. The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 19 adolescents with 20 scaphoid waist fractures that had required operative intervention for nonunion from January 1975 to December 2000. All cases had undergone a trial of plaster immobilization, averaging 4.2 months, before operative intervention was performed. Operative management resulted in a 100% rate of union. Herbert or AO screw fixation and grafting was performed in 11, 2 had K-wire fixation and bone grafting, 6 had bone grafting and no fixation, and one had screw fixation with no graft. All but three patients were available for telephone interview, with an average follow-up of 6.1 years. One reported having mild pain at rest, 4 had discomfort with heavy activity, and the remaining 12 were pain-free. Only two had restriction of activity because of pain, with the remainder returning to previous levels of function. All but one reported complete satisfaction with the results of their operation. Operative intervention of nonunion of scaphoid waist fractures in children consistently offers successful fusion, with very low rates of nonunion and a high rate of patient satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric OrthopaedicsSame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207