Recent changes in the winter diet of murres (<i>Uria</i> spp.) in coastal Newfoundland waters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the winter diet of murres (Uria spp.) in coastal Newfoundland waters in relation to environmental and ecological changes that have occurred in the Northwest Atlantic since the 1980s. We analyzed the contents of 371 stomachs (311 from Thick-billed Murres, Uria lomvia, and 60 from Common Murres, Uria aalge) of birds shot by hunters around the Newfoundland coast during the winters of 1996-1998. We observed that the frequency of empty stomachs was greater in our study than in a similar study conducted during 1984-1986. We found no difference in the proportion of fish in the diet between the 1980s and the 1990s, however, Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida; from 55 to 12%) and capelin (Mallotus villosus; from 28 to 6%) decreased in frequency of occurrence. The proportion of stomachs containing crustaceans and squid did not change between the 1980s and 1990s, but hyperiid amphipods (Parathemisto spp.) replaced euphausiids (Thysanoessa spp.) as the predominant crustacean. Changes in murre winter diet off the coast of Newfoundland corroborate other sources of information indicating that major changes in the distribution and biology of marine organisms occurred in the Northwest Atlantic during the 1990s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".