MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029778027 · doi:10.1080/15325001003735184

Distribution Grid Voltage Control Using Cascaded Multi-level Inverter-based Static Synchronous Compensator

2010· article· en· W2029778027 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Banerjee, Biswarup Das, Pramod Agarwal

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Components and Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatic VAR compensatorControl theory (sociology)InverterTotal harmonic distortionController (irrigation)VoltageEngineeringFuzzy logicFault (geology)Computer scienceAC powerControl engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, the voltage control performance of the cascaded multi-level inverter based static synchronous compensator was studied, specifically, a 21-level cascaded multi-level inverter based static synchronous compensator was considered. The switching angles of the cascaded multi-level inverter based static synchronous compensator have been determined by an optimization methodology based on the sequential quadratic programming technique for minimizing the total harmonic distortion of the static synchronous compensator output voltage. To achieve satisfactory performance of the static synchronous compensator voltage controller, two different fuzzy logic control schemes, namely, indirect and direct control systems, have been developed. The performances of these two developed control schemes for controlling the bus voltage were investigated with detailed non-linear fault simulation studies in a practical power distribution system using PSCAD/EMTDC (Manitoba HVDC Research Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) software and have been found satisfactory. Furthermore, the performances of the proposed fuzzy controllers have also been found to be superior to that obtained with an indirect proportional-integral controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectric Power Components and SystemsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207