MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029848858 · doi:10.7202/044241ar

Les clauses d’exonération de responsabilité : stratégies de traduction

2010· article· fr· W2029848858 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carmen Bestué

Bibliographic record

VenueMeta Journal des traducteurs · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le présent article traite d’une clause spécifique au droit anglo-saxon, celle de l’exonération de responsabilité. Probablement en raison de l’influence croissante de l’usage de l’informatique et, en particulier, d’Internet, le format et la structure des clauses rédigées en français ou espagnol imitent de plus en plus souvent le modèle anglo-saxon. Ce phénomène est, sans aucun doute, le fruit de la traduction. L’article vise à montrer, dans une perspective fonctionnaliste, que la méthode de traduction suivie et les techniques appliquées doivent tenir compte non seulement de critères juridiques ou linguistiques, mais aussi d’autres paramètres pragmatiques comme les facteurs de communication et les facteurs culturels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeta Journal des traducteursSame topicComparative and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207