Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We report our experience at The Ottawa Hospital with outpatient laparoscopic adrenalectomy. METHODS: We report a single surgeon experience. Seventeen consecutive outpatient laparoscopic adrenalectomy were performed between 1994 and 2006. Specific selection criteria were applied. Postoperatively patients were monitored and assessed before discharge. Full discharge instructions were provided. A prescription for analgesic was given. A call back system was put in place. The first postoperative office visit was scheduled within 7 days of surgery. RESULTS: Twelve of 17 patients were females. The mean age was 52.4 years. Our average operating room time was 130 minutes with no conversions. The average stay was about 5.5 hours. Three patients had a 23-hour stay. One admitted with atelectasis. Tumor size ranged from 1 to 5.8 cm. There were no reoperations, late admissions up to 30 days, and no deaths. One patient required admission. Thirteen of 17 patients were contacted by phone after discharge. At our hospital we found a cost saving of C$1478 is made per case. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be safely performed as an outpatient procedure. Strict selection criteria should be applied. Call back systems should be instituted. There is a cost benefit associated with this outpatient procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".