MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029895955 · doi:10.1080/01490451.2014.942445

Ultraviolet Radiation-Absorbing “Humic Pigments” of Cyanobacteria in Microbial Mats: Their Presumptive Photoprotective Function and Relevance to Early Precambrian Microbial Ecology and Evolution

2014· article· en· W2029895955 on OpenAlexaff
Togwell A. Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomicrobiology Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobial matCyanobacteriaPhotosynthesisPigmentEnvironmental chemistryHumic acidPhotoprotectionBotanyChlorophyllBiologyPhotochemistryChemistryEcologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyanobacteria that form the primary components of microbial mats in freshwater bogs and intertidal marine environments in the Bahamas produce water-soluble brown pigments whose spectral properties imply that they are a type of humic acid. These “humic pigments” are produced by vital processes of living cyanobacteria, not by decomposition of dead ones, as shown by decreases in the concentrations of humic pigments, ultraviolet (UV) radiation-absorbing photoprotective mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs), and chlorophyll from upper to lower layers of the mats, and by the occurrence of humic pigments in cyanobacterial cultures. Unlike MAAs, which absorb UV radiation only within limited ranges of wavelengths, humic pigments absorb radiation spanning the entire UV spectrum, and absorbance increases with decreasing wavelength. These observations suggest that the biosynthesis of humic pigments originated as a photoprotective adaptation in the early Precambrian, enabling cyanobacteria to colonize shallow-water and terrestrial environments even though the atmosphere was virtually devoid of O2 and O3 and therefore transparent to all solar radiation in the UV region of the spectrum. Moreover, the evolution of this photoprotective mechanism may have been linked to the evolution of photosynthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeomicrobiology JournalSame topicBiocrusts and Microbial EcologyFrench-language works237,207