Successful Treatment of Adult Onset Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis with Bi-weekly Administration of Pegylated Interferon-α
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Successful Treatment of Adult Onset Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis with Bi-weekly Administration of Pegylated Interferon-α" Fig. S1.CD163 + macrophages and CD206 + macrophages in the lesional skin: percentages of CD163 + macrophages among unstained cells.Paraffin-embedded tissue samples from before (A, C, E) and after (B, D, F) PEG-IFN-α2a therapy were deparaffinised and stained using anti-CD163 Ab and anti-CD206 Ab.Sections were developed with liquid permanent red (red) (Original manifestation; × 100 (A, B), × 200 (C, D)). Immunohistochemical stained sections were quantified with a KS400 image analysis system for optical MEAND, and the staining intensity is presented reciprocally (E, F).Mean intensity on CD163 + cells was compared with that of unstained cells in the same section.Sections were also analysed using a TissueFAXS image cytometer, and all samples were recorded digitally (G, H).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".