MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029981951 · doi:10.1063/1.4770063

Performance of the Los Alamos National Laboratory spallation-driven solid-deuterium ultra-cold neutron source

2013· article· en· W2029981951 on OpenAlexaff
A. Saunders, M. Makela, Yelena Bagdasarova, H.O. Back, J. G. Boissevain, L. J. Broussard, T. J. Bowles, R. Carr, S. Currie, B. W. Filippone, A. Garcı́a, P. Geltenbort, K. P. Hickerson, R. E. Hill, J. Hoagland, S. Hoedl, A. T. Holley, G. Hogan, T. M. Ito, S. K. Lamoreaux, Chen-Yu Liu, Julie C. Liu, R. Mammei, J. W. Martin, D. Melconian, M. P. Mendenhall, C. L. Morris, R. Mortensen, R. W. Pattie, M. Pitt, Brad Plaster, J. Ramsey, Raymond Rios, A. L. Sallaska, S. J. Seestrom, É. I. Sharapov, Sky Sjue, W. E. Sondheim, W. A. Teasdale, A. R. Young, B. VornDick, R. B. Vogelaar, ‪Zhehui Wang, Yanping Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpallationSpallation Neutron SourceMonte Carlo methodNeutron sourceNuclear physicsNeutronDeuteriumPhysicsNational laboratoryNeutron fluxNeutron time-of-flight scatteringNeutron transportNuclear engineeringNeutron scatteringNeutron cross sectionEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we describe the performance of the Los Alamos spallation-driven solid-deuterium ultra-cold neutron (UCN) source. Measurements of the cold neutron flux, the very low energy neutron production rate, and the UCN rates and density at the exit from the biological shield are presented and compared to Monte Carlo predictions. The cold neutron rates compare well with predictions from the Monte Carlo code MCNPX and the UCN rates agree with our custom UCN Monte Carlo code. The source is shown to perform as modeled. The maximum delivered UCN density at the exit from the biological shield is 52(9) UCN/cc with a solid deuterium volume of ~1500 cm(3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207