Gender-Related Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Responses in Naïve Volunteers With Toll-Like Receptor 4 Polymorphisms Exposed in a Swine Confinement Facility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this work is to better understand the responses of people that are exposed to agricultural organic dust and other factors in modern swine production. We investigated the effects of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) genotype and gender on respiratory responses of naïve volunteers (18-28 years) to swine barn exposure. Non-smoking healthy subjects (16 men and 13 women) with TLR4 299 (Asp299Gly) and/or 399 (Thr399Ile) polymorphisms (TLR4 299/399) and age-sex matched subjects with TLR4 wild-type alleles spent 5 h in a nonexposed environment (baseline day) and 5 h in a swine facility (exposure day). The results showed significant decreases between baseline and exposure days in across-shift forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), forced midexpiratory flow rate (FEF(25-75)), and FEV(1)/FVC ratio and in methacholine concentration that reduced FEV1 by 20% (PC(20)) in all groups; however, there were no differences by sex or genotype. Similarly, nasal cytokines, serum cytokines, and blood neutrophil count increased after exposure; in contrast, however, these were influenced by gender. The increase in serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) between baseline and exposure was gender-dependent with male sex associated with a significant increase in the wild-type group and female sex associated with a significant increase in the polymorphic group. These results suggest that for persons exposed to a swine facility, one's immunological response varies with gender as well as TLR4 genotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".