MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030048781 · doi:10.3109/02770900903199961

Polymorphism of the <i>ADRB2</i> Gene and Response to Inhaled Beta- agonists in Children with Asthma: A Meta-analysis

2009· review· en· W2030048781 on OpenAlexaff
Yaron Finkelstein, Facundo García‐Bournissen, Janine R. Hutson, Michael Shannon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asthma · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaBronchodilatorOdds ratioSingle-nucleotide polymorphismSalbutamolAdrenergicInternal medicineAdrenergic receptorGenotypeGeneReceptorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: About 9% of children have asthma, corresponding to almost 6.8 million children in the USA and 1.1 million in the UK. Asthma exacerbations are the leading cause of pediatric emergency room visits and impose a large burden on the individual, family, and society. There is mounting evidence that therapeutic failure of inhaled beta-agonists is associated with polymorphisms of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor gene (ADRB2); specifically, mutations leading to amino acid changes at positions 16 and 27, which alter down-regulation of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR), induce resistance to the smooth-muscle relaxing effect of beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the association between ADRB2 polymorphisms and the response to inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists in children with asthma. We included all published studies until November 2008, in which asthmatic children underwent testing for acute bronchodilator response, defined as > or = 15% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping for positions 16 and/or 27 of the beta(2)AR. Individual and summary odds ratios were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS: We identified three case-control or family-based studies involving 960 asthmatic children (692 children with negative beta(2)-bronchodilator response, defined as < 15% improvement in FEV(1) and 268 children with positive bronchodilator response). We found a significant association between favorable therapeutic response to inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists in asthmatic children and the Arg/Arg phenotype at position 16 of the beta(2)AR [OR = 1.77; 95% CI (1.01; 3.1); p = 0.029], compared with the Arg/Gly or Gly/Gly phenotypes. The beneficial effect of Arg at position 16 of the beta(2)AR was most pronounced in African-American asthmatic children [OR = 3.54; 95% CI (1.37, 9.13)]. There was no association between clinical response to beta(2)-agonists and polymorphism at amino acid position 27 of the beta(2)AR (OR = 1.04; 95% CI [0.76,1.42]). CONCLUSIONS: Failure of bronchodilator response to inhaled beta-agonists in asthmatic children is associated with the Gly allele (Arg/Gly and Gly/Gly genotypes) at position 16 of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Genetic typing for beta(2)AR polymorphism may help identify children with drug-resistant asthma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.036
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AsthmaSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207