A Comprehensive Approach for Thermal Error Model Optimization for ANN-Based Real-Time Error Compensation in CNC Machine Tools
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thermally induced errors play a critical role in the control of machining accuracy. They can account for as much as 70% of dimensional errors in produced parts. Since thermal errors cannot totally be eliminated at the design phase, errors compensation appears to be the most economical solution. Accurate and efficient modeling of the thermally induced errors is an essential part of the error compensation process. This paper presents a comprehensive approach for thermal error modeling optimization. The proposed optimization method is based on multiple temperature measurements, Taguchi’s orthogonal arrays, various statistical tools and artificial neural networks to provide cost effective selection of appropriate temperature variables and modeling conditions as well as to achieve robust and accurate thermal error models. The proposed approach can be effectively and advantageously used for real-time thermal error compensation since it presents the benefit of straightforward application, reduced modeling time and uncertainty. The experimental results on a CNC turning center confirm the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed optimization method and show that the resultant model can accurately predict the time-variant thermal error components under various operating conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".