MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030098671 · doi:10.1121/1.2942538

Finite-element modeling of microsphere surface modes and high-frequency ultrasound scattering from a single cell

2007· article· en· W2030098671 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Falou, J. Carl Kumaradas, Michael C. Kolios

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackscatter (email)ScatteringMultiphysicsFinite element methodMaterials scienceUltrasoundAcousticsOpticsMechanicsComputational physicsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A finite-element model of wave propagation using COMSOL Multiphysics (COMSOL Inc., Burlington, MA) was developed to solve the problem of high-frequency ultrasound (10–70 MHz) scattering from spheres. This model is being used to predict ultrasound backscatter from cells for ultrasound tissue characterization. In this work, backscatter from an elastic (polystyrene) microsphere was used to validate the computational model against experimental results. Agreement between experimental results and finite-element solutions were found in the frequency domain solutions. Moreover, conversion of the theoretical solutions to time-domain backscatter data showed good agreement with experimental time domain measurements. To develop a better understanding of the interactions of the incident pressure field with the scattering object, oscillations of the elastic microsphere at various resonance frequencies were also investigated. A systematic relationship between the resonance frequency and its corresponding surface mode was found. An ultrasound scattering model by a single cell is also presented. The model treats the cell as an elastic sphere (nucleus) surrounded by a fluid shell (cytoplasm). Comparison of the theoretical backscatter predicted by the model and experimental measurements for acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) cell is also shown. Finally, the implications of these results on ultrasound tissue characterization techniques are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207